BTGD vs. ETHD
BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) and ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -30.17% vs -42.18% for ETHD. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. BTGD charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for ETHD.
Performance
BTGD vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 63.80% return.
BTGD
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- -20.36%
- YTD
- -28.65%
- 6M
- -31.64%
- 1Y
- -30.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD
- 1D
- 11.25%
- 1M
- 66.19%
- YTD
- 63.80%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- -42.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTGD vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -28.65% | 34.62% | 29.81% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 63.80% | -72.49% | -57.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTGD and ETHD is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | -0.72 |
The correlation between BTGD and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.78 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTGD vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank
BTGD
ETHD
BTGD vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTGD | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.05 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.51 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -0.64 | -0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTGD | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | -0.31 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | -0.35 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
BTGD vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and ETHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTGD | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.73% | -95.59% | +47.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.73% | -83.63% | +35.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.73% | -87.20% | +39.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.58% | -66.01% | +51.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.09% | 66.00% | -41.91% |
Volatility
BTGD vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) is 11.95%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 19.00%. This indicates that BTGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTGD | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | 19.00% | -7.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.64% | 92.37% | -46.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.04% | 136.23% | -81.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.51% | 142.19% | -86.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.51% | 142.19% | -86.68% |
BTGD vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTGD vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison
BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than ETHD's 10.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 4.71% | 3.36% | 0.19% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 10.68% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTGD and ETHD have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHD has higher volatility (19.00%) compared to BTGD (11.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -47.73% vs ETHD's -95.59%.
On 1-year performance, BTGD leads with -30.17% vs -42.18% for ETHD. On fees, BTGD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, BTGD has been the lower-risk option at 11.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTGD has performed better with a -30.17% return vs -42.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTGD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 4.71% for BTGD.
They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTGD and ETHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer