PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTGD vs. ETHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTGD vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 63.80% return.


BTGD

1D
-4.01%
1M
-20.36%
YTD
-28.65%
6M
-31.64%
1Y
-30.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETHD

1D
11.25%
1M
66.19%
YTD
63.80%
6M
72.54%
1Y
-42.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTGD vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
-28.65%34.62%29.81%
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
63.80%-72.49%-57.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BTGD and ETHD is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024

-0.72

The correlation between BTGD and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.78 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTGD vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTGD
BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHD
ETHD Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ETHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTGD vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTGDETHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.05

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

-0.51

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

-0.64

-0.61

BTGD vs. ETHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the ETHD Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTGD and ETHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTGDETHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

-0.31

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-0.35

+0.61

Drawdowns

BTGD vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and ETHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTGDETHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.73%

-95.59%

+47.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.73%

-83.63%

+35.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.73%

-87.20%

+39.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.58%

-66.01%

+51.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.09%

66.00%

-41.91%

Volatility

BTGD vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) is 11.95%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 19.00%. This indicates that BTGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTGDETHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.95%

19.00%

-7.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.64%

92.37%

-46.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.04%

136.23%

-81.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.51%

142.19%

-86.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.51%

142.19%

-86.68%

BTGD vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTGD vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison

BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than ETHD's 10.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
4.71%3.36%0.19%
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
10.68%156.62%19.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTGD and ETHD have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHD has higher volatility (19.00%) compared to BTGD (11.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -47.73% vs ETHD's -95.59%.

On 1-year performance, BTGD leads with -30.17% vs -42.18% for ETHD. On fees, BTGD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, BTGD has been the lower-risk option at 11.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTGD has performed better with a -30.17% return vs -42.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTGD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.

ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 4.71% for BTGD.

They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 1.01% for ETHD.

ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTGD and ETHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer