BTGD vs. BLOX
BTGD (STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF) and BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -43.38% vs -9.33% for BLOX. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BTGD charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BLOX.
Performance
BTGD vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -38.50% return, which is significantly lower than BLOX's -2.97% return.
BTGD
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- -37.24%
- YTD
- -38.50%
- 1Y
- -43.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.87%
BLOX
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- -2.97%
- 1Y
- -9.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.76M | $4.89M | $6.19M | |
| $428.43K | $383.52K | $1.03M |
BTGD vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTGD STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF | -38.50% | -4.94% |
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | -2.97% | 8.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTGD and BLOX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | 0.72 |
The correlation between BTGD and BLOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTGD vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank
BTGD
BLOX
BTGD vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTGD | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.02 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.20 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -0.36 | -0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTGD vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, which is greater than BLOX's maximum drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and BLOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTGD | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.79% | -47.09% | -11.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.79% | -47.09% | -11.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.95% | -32.93% | -22.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.27% | -19.92% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.74% | 25.70% | +7.04% |
Volatility
BTGD vs. BLOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) is 12.81%, while Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) has a volatility of 20.05%. This indicates that BTGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTGD | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.81% | 20.05% | -7.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.87% | 42.91% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.20% | 56.87% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.65% | 55.05% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.65% | 55.05% | +0.60% |
BTGD vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTGD has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTGD vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison
BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, less than BLOX's 48.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 48.57% | 22.69% | 0.00% |
BTGD STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF | 5.47% | 3.36% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTGD and BLOX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLOX has higher volatility (20.05%) compared to BTGD (12.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -58.79% vs BLOX's -47.09%.
On 1-year performance, BLOX leads with -9.33% vs -43.38% for BTGD. On fees, BLOX is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, BTGD has been the lower-risk option at 12.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BLOX has performed better with a -9.33% return vs -43.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLOX is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BTGD.
BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 48.57%, compared with 5.47% for BTGD.
They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for BTGD and 1.03% for BLOX.
BLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTGD and BLOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer