PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTGD vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTGD vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.39% return.


BTGD

1D
-4.01%
1M
-20.36%
YTD
-28.65%
6M
-31.64%
1Y
-30.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-9.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTGD vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
-28.65%-19.90%
BFOC
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October
-7.39%-9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BTGD and BFOC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTGD vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTGD
BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BFOC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTGD vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTGDBFOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

BTGD vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTGDBFOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-1.88

+2.14

Drawdowns

BTGD vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTGDBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.73%

-18.20%

-29.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.73%

-18.20%

-29.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.58%

-12.52%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.09%

Volatility

BTGD vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTGDBFOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.04%

12.61%

+42.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.51%

12.61%

+42.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.51%

12.61%

+42.90%

BTGD vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTGD vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BFOC
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
4.71%3.36%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTGD and BFOC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.

BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.

BTGD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTGD and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer