BTG vs. CLF
BTG (B2Gold Corp.) and CLF (Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — BTG in Gold, CLF in Steel. Over the past 10 years, BTG returned 9.37%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for CLF. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTG vs. CLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTG achieves a -5.82% return, which is significantly lower than CLF's 3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BTG has underperformed CLF with an annualized return of 9.37%, while CLF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.73% annualized return.
BTG
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -21.06%
- YTD
- -5.82%
- 6M
- -7.67%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
CLF
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 25.39%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 91.92%
- 3Y*
- -6.24%
- 5Y*
- -10.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
BTG vs. CLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTG B2Gold Corp. | -5.82% | 88.95% | -18.07% | -7.22% | -5.13% | -26.97% | 42.35% | 37.72% | -5.81% | 30.80% |
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 3.77% | 41.28% | -53.97% | 26.75% | -26.00% | 49.52% | 77.38% | 12.72% | 6.66% | -14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTG and CLF is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2008 | 0.19 |
The correlation between BTG and CLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (10 years) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BTG:
$6.32B
CLF:
$7.78B
BTG:
$0.36
CLF:
-$2.37
BTG:
1.74
CLF:
0.37
BTG:
1.72
CLF:
1.34
BTG:
$3.67B
CLF:
$18.90B
BTG:
$1.89B
CLF:
-$528.00M
BTG:
$1.96B
CLF:
$134.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTG vs. CLF — Risk / Return Rank
BTG
CLF
BTG vs. CLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B2Gold Corp. (BTG) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTG | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.79 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 3.68 | -2.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTG vs. CLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTG drawdown since its inception was -85.97%, smaller than the maximum CLF drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTG and CLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTG | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.97% | -98.78% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.97% | -51.67% | +14.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.97% | -74.46% | +37.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.92% | -82.37% | +33.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.35% | -82.37% | +19.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.60% | -85.95% | +54.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -47.62% | +9.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.70% | 25.06% | -6.36% |
Volatility
BTG vs. CLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for B2Gold Corp. (BTG) is 15.76%, while Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a volatility of 22.19%. This indicates that BTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTG | CLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.76% | 22.19% | -6.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.50% | 47.32% | -2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.48% | 68.48% | -13.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.82% | 59.28% | -14.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.23% | 62.12% | -13.89% |
Dividends
BTG vs. CLF - Dividend Comparison
BTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTG B2Gold Corp. | 1.90% | 1.77% | 6.56% | 5.06% | 4.48% | 4.07% | 1.96% | 0.25% |
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% |
Financials
BTG vs. CLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B2Gold Corp. and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BTG vs. CLF - Profitability Comparison
BTG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B2Gold Corp. reported a gross profit of 601.32M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.
CLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported a gross profit of -82.00M and revenue of 4.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.7%.
BTG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B2Gold Corp. reported an operating income of 572.52M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 50.1%.
CLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported an operating income of -207.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.2%.
BTG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B2Gold Corp. reported a net income of 197.17M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
CLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. reported a net income of -237.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTG and CLF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLF has higher volatility (22.19%) compared to BTG (15.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTG dropped -85.97% vs CLF's -98.78%.
CLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTG and CLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer