BTF vs. VT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BTF (Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTF is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Valkyrie, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. BTF is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BTF returned 14.70%/yr vs 21.29%/yr for VT. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTF charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

BTF vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTF achieves a -30.57% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 13.23% return.

BTF

• 1D: -5.41%
• 1M: -16.05%
• YTD: -30.57%
• 6M: -32.41%
• 1Y: -32.30%
• 3Y*: 14.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 13.23%
• 6M: 14.61%
• 1Y: 30.72%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 11.39%
• 10Y*: 12.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTF vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF	-30.57%	-12.44%	67.60%	136.86%	-63.05%	-26.38%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	13.23%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BTF and VT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2021	0.46

The correlation between BTF and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BTF vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTF

BTF Risk / Return Rank: 4
BTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BTF Martin Ratio Rank: 4

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 72
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTF vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTF	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.60	2.44	-3.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	3.36	-3.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.44	-0.51
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	3.27	-3.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.99	14.59	-15.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTF vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTF Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTF and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTF	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.60	2.44	-3.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	0.44	-0.59

Drawdowns

BTF vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTF drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTF and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTF	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.50%	-50.27%	-27.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.75%	-9.67%	-46.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.75%	-16.51%	-39.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.59%	0.00%	-54.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.64%	-7.02%	-32.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.13%	2.17%	+30.96%

Volatility

BTF vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.75%. This indicates that BTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTF	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	3.75%	+5.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.97%	10.13%	+29.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.18%	12.67%	+41.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.42%	16.04%	+42.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.42%	17.23%	+41.19%

BTF vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTF has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTF vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 209.94%, more than VT's 1.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF	209.94%	146.05%	52.96%	15.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.58%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTF and VT in my portfolio?

BTF and VT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTF or VT?

BTF has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to VT (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTF dropped -77.50% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, BTF or VT?

On 3-year performance, VT leads with 21.29% vs 14.70% for BTF. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTF or VT?

Over the 3-year period, VT has performed better with a 21.29% return vs 14.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTF or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTF or VT?

BTF has the higher dividend yield at 209.94%, compared with 1.58% for VT.

What is the main difference between BTF and VT?

BTF is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while VT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for BTF and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.