BTCZ vs. TTDU
BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and TTDU (T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TTDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. BTCZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TTDU.
Performance
BTCZ vs. TTDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCZ achieves a 40.86% return, which is significantly higher than TTDU's -83.24% return.
BTCZ
- 1D
- 6.37%
- 1M
- 40.52%
- YTD
- 40.86%
- 6M
- 41.38%
- 1Y
- 59.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTDU
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -38.58%
- YTD
- -83.24%
- 6M
- -82.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ vs. TTDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 40.86% | 52.84% |
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | -83.24% | -36.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCZ and TTDU is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCZ vs. TTDU — Risk / Return Rank
BTCZ
TTDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTCZ vs. TTDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCZ | TTDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCZ vs. TTDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCZ drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, roughly equal to the maximum TTDU drawdown of -92.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCZ and TTDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCZ | TTDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.06% | -92.45% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.28% | -92.45% | +15.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.68% | -61.09% | -12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.87% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCZ vs. TTDU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCZ | TTDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.72% | 105.80% | -17.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.08% | 105.80% | -8.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.08% | 105.80% | -8.72% |
BTCZ vs. TTDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TTDU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCZ vs. TTDU - Dividend Comparison
BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while TTDU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCZ and TTDU have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.
BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for TTDU.
BTCZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while TTDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCZ and 1.50% for TTDU.
Find the right allocation for BTCZ and TTDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer