BTCZ vs. CRCD
BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by T-Rex, while CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTCZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.
Performance
BTCZ vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCZ achieves a 32.54% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -88.01% return.
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- 46.26%
- YTD
- 32.54%
- 6M
- 46.67%
- 1Y
- 55.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCD
- 1D
- 20.12%
- 1M
- 35.97%
- YTD
- -88.01%
- 6M
- -87.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 32.54% | 34.53% |
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -88.01% | 43.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCZ and CRCD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCZ vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank
BTCZ
CRCD
BTCZ vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCZ | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCZ | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | -0.45 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
BTCZ vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCZ drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, smaller than the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCZ and CRCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCZ | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.06% | -96.95% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.63% | -94.31% | +15.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.72% | -54.51% | -19.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.74% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCZ vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCZ | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.46% | 204.54% | -117.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.12% | 204.54% | -107.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.12% | 204.54% | -107.42% |
BTCZ vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCZ vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison
BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCZ and CRCD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.
BTCZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CRCD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCZ and 1.50% for CRCD.
Find the right allocation for BTCZ and CRCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer