BTCX-B.TO vs. EBIT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTCX-B.TO (CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units) and EBIT.TO (Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Over the past 5 years, BTCX-B.TO returned 14.29%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for EBIT.TO. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BTCX-B.TO charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EBIT.TO.

Performance

BTCX-B.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BTCX-B.TO having a -24.79% return and EBIT.TO slightly lower at -24.84%.

BTCX-B.TO

• 1D: -2.37%
• 1M: -16.88%
• YTD: -24.79%
• 6M: -30.42%
• 1Y: -38.32%
• 3Y*: 34.38%
• 5Y*: 14.29%
• 10Y*: —

EBIT.TO

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -17.64%
• YTD: -24.84%
• 6M: -30.52%
• 1Y: -38.71%
• 3Y*: 33.13%
• 5Y*: 13.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCX-B.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BTCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units	-24.79%	-11.32%	139.01%	149.40%	-62.06%	-16.98%
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD	-24.84%	-11.88%	134.59%	146.50%	-62.36%	-17.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCX-B.TO and EBIT.TO is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021	0.99

The correlation between BTCX-B.TO and EBIT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTCX-B.TO vs. EBIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCX-B.TO

BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EBIT.TO

EBIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2
EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EBIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EBIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EBIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EBIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCX-B.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCX-B.TO	EBIT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	-0.91	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.24	-1.26	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.86	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	-0.77	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	-1.33	+0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCX-B.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is comparable to the EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCX-B.TO and EBIT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCX-B.TO	EBIT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	-0.91	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.25	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.05	+0.03

Drawdowns

BTCX-B.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.26%, roughly equal to the maximum EBIT.TO drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCX-B.TO and EBIT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCX-B.TO	EBIT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.26%	-75.45%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.41%	-50.63%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.41%	-50.63%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.26%	-75.45%	+0.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.50%	-48.66%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.95%	-33.06%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.08%	29.25%	-0.17%

Volatility

BTCX-B.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) have volatilities of 9.83% and 9.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCX-B.TO	EBIT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.83%	9.66%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.96%	34.02%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.89%	42.89%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.13%	53.64%	+0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.99%	54.80%	+0.19%

BTCX-B.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCX-B.TO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EBIT.TO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCX-B.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCX-B.TO nor EBIT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCX-B.TO and EBIT.TO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, BTCX-B.TO and EBIT.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BTCX-B.TO or EBIT.TO?

On fees, EBIT.TO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCX-B.TO or EBIT.TO?

EBIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

What is the main difference between BTCX-B.TO and EBIT.TO?

They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO and 0.75% for EBIT.TO.