BTCW vs. QGRW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW).

BTCW and QGRW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTCW is managed by WisdomTree. It was launched on Jan 11, 2024. QGRW is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2022.

Performance

BTCW vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BTCW vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	-22.24%	-6.05%	100.00%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	-7.80%	19.20%	34.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -22.24% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's -7.80% return.

BTCW

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: -22.24%
• 6M: -42.12%
• 1Y: -19.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QGRW

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -4.85%
• YTD: -7.80%
• 6M: -6.06%
• 1Y: 22.02%
• 3Y*: 24.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCW vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

BTCW

Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund

QGRW

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund

Return for Risk

BTCW vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCW

BTCW Risk / Return Rank: 6
BTCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BTCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BTCW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
BTCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BTCW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 53
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCW vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCW	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.44	0.91	-1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.37	1.45	-1.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.20	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	1.51	-1.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.75	5.66	-6.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCW vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCW Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCW and QGRW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCW	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44	0.91	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	1.32	-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between BTCW and QGRW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BTCW vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

BTCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.09%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%

Drawdowns

BTCW vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCW	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.29%	-24.40%	-24.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.29%	-15.44%	-33.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.80%	-10.67%	-35.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.16%	-3.33%	-10.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.23%	4.12%	+19.11%

Volatility

BTCW vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) has a higher volatility of 12.82% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) at 7.91%. This indicates that BTCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCW	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.82%	7.91%	+4.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.58%	13.96%	+22.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.26%	24.20%	+21.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.13%	21.23%	+29.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.13%	21.23%	+29.90%