BTCW vs. DGRW
BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCW is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by WisdomTree, while DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Over the past year, BTCW returned -38.63% vs 20.79% for DGRW. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCW charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
BTCW vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -25.39% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 9.10% return.
BTCW
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- -18.38%
- YTD
- -25.39%
- 6M
- -29.81%
- 1Y
- -38.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRW
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 20.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
BTCW vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | -25.39% | -6.05% | 100.00% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 9.10% | 12.17% | 16.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCW and DGRW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCW vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
BTCW
DGRW
BTCW vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCW | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.39 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 2.52 | -3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 11.03 | -12.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCW | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 2.12 | -3.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.86 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
BTCW vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCW | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.29% | -32.04% | -17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.29% | -8.30% | -40.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.99% | -0.83% | -47.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -3.01% | -12.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.40% | 1.89% | +26.51% |
Volatility
BTCW vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) has a higher volatility of 9.48% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.47%. This indicates that BTCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCW | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 2.47% | +7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.25% | 7.64% | +26.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.53% | 9.88% | +33.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.10% | 13.97% | +36.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.10% | 16.21% | +33.89% |
BTCW vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCW vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
BTCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCW and DGRW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCW has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to DGRW (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -49.29% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
On 1-year performance, DGRW leads with 20.79% vs -38.63% for BTCW. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 20.79% return vs -38.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BTCW.
DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for BTCW.
BTCW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while DGRW is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.28% for DGRW.
DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCW and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer