BTCO vs. EZET

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

BTCO (Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BTCO tracks the Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate while EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BTCO returned -46.30% vs -46.15% for EZET. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTCO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.

Performance

BTCO vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCO achieves a -26.81% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -37.92% return.

BTCO

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.14%
• 6M: -32.98%
• YTD: -26.81%
• 1Y: -46.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZET

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: 6.39%
• 6M: -44.02%
• YTD: -37.92%
• 1Y: -46.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCO vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF	-26.81%	-6.58%	36.64%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-37.92%	-11.23%	-4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCO and EZET is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.82

The correlation between BTCO and EZET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTCO vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCO

BTCO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 4
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 4
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCO vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCO	EZET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.05	-0.69	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.60	-0.82	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.91	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	-0.68	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	-1.06	-0.34

BTCO vs. EZET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCO Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the EZET Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCO and EZET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCO vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -53.33%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and EZET.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCO	EZET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.33%	-67.89%	+14.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.33%	-67.89%	+14.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.02%	-61.95%	+12.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.65%	-34.69%	+17.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.25%	43.72%	-10.47%

Volatility

BTCO vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) is 10.68%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 14.52%. This indicates that BTCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCO	EZET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.68%	14.52%	-3.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.53%	46.99%	-12.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.14%	67.52%	-23.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.41%	71.84%	-22.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.41%	71.84%	-22.43%

BTCO vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BTCO vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCO nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCO and EZET in my portfolio?

BTCO and EZET have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCO or EZET?

EZET has higher volatility (14.52%) compared to BTCO (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCO dropped -53.33% vs EZET's -67.89%.

Which ETF is better, BTCO or EZET?

On 1-year performance, EZET leads with -46.15% vs -46.30% for BTCO. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BTCO has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCO or EZET?

Over the 1-year period, EZET has performed better with a -46.15% return vs -46.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCO or EZET?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BTCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCO or EZET?

BTCO and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BTCO and EZET?

BTCO tracks Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate, while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BTCO and 0.19% for EZET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.