BTCO vs. ECCC
BTCO (Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate, while ECCC (Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, BTCO returned -38.71% vs 16.17% for ECCC. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTCO vs. ECCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCO achieves a -25.40% return, which is significantly lower than ECCC's 1.93% return.
BTCO
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -18.43%
- YTD
- -25.40%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECCC
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 16.17%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCO vs. ECCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | -25.40% | -6.58% | 100.54% |
ECCC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. | 1.93% | 16.21% | 12.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCO and ECCC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCO vs. ECCC — Risk / Return Rank
BTCO
ECCC
BTCO vs. ECCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCO | ECCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.28 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 3.78 | -4.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 10.44 | -11.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCO | ECCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 1.45 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.58 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
BTCO vs. ECCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than ECCC's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and ECCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCO | ECCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -19.16% | -30.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.33% | -4.29% | -45.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.03% | -1.04% | -46.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -3.72% | -12.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.41% | 1.55% | +26.86% |
Volatility
BTCO vs. ECCC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) at 4.17%. This indicates that BTCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCO | ECCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 4.17% | +5.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.37% | 8.37% | +26.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.56% | 11.24% | +32.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.77% | 12.24% | +37.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.77% | 12.24% | +37.53% |
Dividends
BTCO vs. ECCC - Dividend Comparison
BTCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ECCC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. | 6.61% | 6.55% | 7.10% | 7.81% | 7.95% | 3.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCO and ECCC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCO has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to ECCC (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCO dropped -49.33% vs ECCC's -19.16%.
ECCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCO and ECCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer