PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCO vs. ECCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTCO vs. ECCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BTCO vs. ECCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTCO
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
-22.16%-6.58%100.54%
ECCC
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
0.35%16.21%12.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCO achieves a -22.16% return, which is significantly lower than ECCC's 0.35% return.


BTCO

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
-22.16%
6M
-42.11%
1Y
-20.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ECCC

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
0.35%
6M
7.41%
1Y
12.32%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCO vs. ECCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCO
BTCO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BTCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ECCC
ECCC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ECCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECCC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ECCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECCC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCO vs. ECCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCOECCCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.45

1.16

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.38

1.66

-2.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.23

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

2.65

-3.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

6.21

-6.97

BTCO vs. ECCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the ECCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCO and ECCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCOECCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

1.16

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.57

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between BTCO and ECCC is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BTCO vs. ECCC - Dividend Comparison

BTCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%.


TTM20252024202320222021
BTCO
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ECCC
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
6.64%6.55%7.10%7.81%7.95%3.48%

Drawdowns

BTCO vs. ECCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than ECCC's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and ECCC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCOECCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-19.16%

-30.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.33%

-4.84%

-44.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.78%

-0.55%

-45.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.11%

-3.82%

-10.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.23%

2.07%

+21.16%

Volatility

BTCO vs. ECCC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) at 3.02%. This indicates that BTCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BTCOECCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.03%

3.02%

+10.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.73%

8.04%

+28.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.12%

10.72%

+34.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.78%

12.24%

+38.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.78%

12.24%

+38.54%