PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECCC vs. CCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECCC vs. CCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) and Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECCC achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than CCD's 27.73% return.


ECCC

1D
0.08%
1M
2.45%
YTD
4.24%
6M
4.50%
1Y
15.46%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*

CCD

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.35%
YTD
27.73%
6M
24.54%
1Y
46.35%
3Y*
17.78%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECCC vs. CCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ECCC
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
4.24%16.21%14.03%14.18%-13.45%5.02%
CCD
Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund
27.73%-4.26%35.89%7.98%-28.00%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ECCC and CCD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021

0.12

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

ECCC:

$141.34M

CCD:

$109.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ECCC:

$113.66M

CCD:

$84.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

ECCC:

-$133.96M

CCD:

$109.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECCC vs. CCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECCC
ECCC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ECCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECCC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ECCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECCC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CCD
CCD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECCC vs. CCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) and Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECCCCCDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

4.20

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.78

18.26

-8.48

ECCC vs. CCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the CCD Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECCC and CCD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECCC vs. CCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECCC drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum CCD drawdown of -55.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECCC and CCD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECCCCCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-55.42%

+36.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.29%

-11.08%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.88%

-22.28%

+15.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-37.54%

+18.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-11.79%

+8.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

2.55%

-0.97%

Volatility

ECCC vs. CCD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) is 3.67%, while Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that ECCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECCCCCDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

6.47%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

15.36%

-6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.43%

18.27%

-6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

20.44%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.25%

25.87%

-13.62%

Dividends

ECCC vs. CCD - Dividend Comparison

ECCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, less than CCD's 9.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCD
Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund
9.15%11.22%9.63%11.83%11.42%7.43%7.11%8.93%12.21%9.99%11.43%7.40%
ECCC
Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
6.50%6.55%7.10%7.81%7.95%3.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ECCC vs. CCD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. and Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
31.44M
11.79M
(ECCC) Total Revenue
(CCD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ECCC and CCD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCD has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to ECCC (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECCC dropped -19.16% vs CCD's -55.42%.

CCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECCC and CCD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer