ECCC vs. CLOZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ECCC (Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.) is a stock, while CLOZ (Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF) is CLO fund actively managed by Panagram. Over the past 3 years, ECCC returned 12.49%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for CLOZ. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ECCC vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECCC achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 2.55% return.

ECCC

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 6.98%
• 1Y: 16.94%
• 3Y*: 12.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOZ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 6.17%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECCC vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ECCC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.	1.63%	16.21%	14.03%	6.64%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	2.55%	5.99%	11.85%	14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ECCC and CLOZ is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2023	0.05

Return for Risk

ECCC vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECCC

ECCC Risk / Return Rank: 82
ECCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ECCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ECCC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ECCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ECCC Martin Ratio Rank: 88

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 48
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECCC vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECCC	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.79	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.29	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.45	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	1.56	+2.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	5.19	+5.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECCC vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECCC and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECCC	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.79	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	2.77	-2.20

Drawdowns

ECCC vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECCC drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECCC and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECCC	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.16%	-5.32%	-13.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.29%	-3.90%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.88%	-5.32%	-1.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-0.10%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-0.38%	-3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	1.17%	+0.38%

Volatility

ECCC vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (ECCC) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.55%. This indicates that ECCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECCC	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	0.55%	+3.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.41%	3.13%	+5.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.24%	3.45%	+7.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.25%	3.81%	+8.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.25%	3.81%	+8.44%

Dividends

ECCC vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

ECCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than CLOZ's 8.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	8.01%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%	0.00%
ECCC Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.	6.63%	6.55%	7.10%	7.81%	7.95%	3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECCC and CLOZ in my portfolio?

ECCC and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ECCC or CLOZ?

ECCC has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to CLOZ (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECCC dropped -19.16% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.