PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCL vs. GUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTCL vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BTCL vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCL achieves a -46.59% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 87.03% return.


BTCL

1D
1.25%
1M
-5.85%
YTD
-46.59%
6M
-73.47%
1Y
-56.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GUSH

1D
-7.69%
1M
19.66%
YTD
87.03%
6M
61.77%
1Y
53.22%
3Y*
12.65%
5Y*
17.99%
10Y*
-32.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTCL vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BTCL vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCL
BTCL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCL vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCLGUSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

0.79

-1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.65

1.35

-2.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.19

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

1.26

-1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.31

3.14

-4.45

BTCL vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCL Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCL and GUSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCLGUSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

0.79

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

-0.43

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between BTCL and GUSH is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BTCL vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

BTCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than GUSH's 1.33% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BTCL
T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
3.17%1.70%4.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.33%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%

Drawdowns

BTCL vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCL drawdown since its inception was -78.41%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCL and GUSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCLGUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.41%

-99.98%

+21.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.41%

-43.67%

-34.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.78%

-99.77%

+22.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.40%

-92.81%

+62.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.03%

17.57%

+23.46%

Volatility

BTCL vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) has a higher volatility of 25.68% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) at 16.69%. This indicates that BTCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BTCLGUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.68%

16.69%

+8.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.39%

39.24%

+35.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.56%

67.59%

+22.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.31%

68.73%

+31.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.31%

94.30%

+6.01%