BTCL vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BTCL (T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCL is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTCL charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

BTCL vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCL achieves a -58.31% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 94.41% return.

BTCL

• 1D: -6.31%
• 1M: -34.40%
• YTD: -58.31%
• 6M: -58.78%
• 1Y: -75.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: 42.63%
• YTD: 94.41%
• 6M: 64.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCL vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	-58.31%	-2.45%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	94.41%	-13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCL and CIFU is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

BTCL vs. CIFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCL

BTCL Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BTCL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BTCL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CIFU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCL vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCL	CIFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.52	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	—	—

Drawdowns

BTCL vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCL drawdown since its inception was -82.70%, which is greater than CIFU's maximum drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCL and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCL	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.70%	-77.20%	-5.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.88%	-10.48%	-71.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.34%	-42.93%	+7.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTCL	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.39%	207.07%	-118.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	97.74%	207.07%	-109.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	97.74%	207.07%	-109.33%

BTCL vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCL vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

BTCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, while CIFU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	4.07%	1.70%	4.35%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCL and CIFU in my portfolio?

BTCL and CIFU have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BTCL or CIFU?

On fees, BTCL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCL or CIFU?

BTCL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCL or CIFU?

BTCL has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.00% for CIFU.

What is the main difference between BTCL and CIFU?

BTCL is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCL and 1.50% for CIFU.