PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCK vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCK vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF (BTCK) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BTCK

1D
0.99%
1M
1.74%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.38%
6M
-8.81%
YTD
-7.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCK vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BTCK and BFOC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCK vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF (BTCK) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTCK vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTCK vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCK drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum BFOC drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCK and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCKBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-18.41%

+10.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.15%

-17.91%

+10.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-13.09%

+8.08%

Volatility

BTCK vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCKBFOCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.57%

12.06%

+32.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.57%

12.06%

+32.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.57%

12.06%

+32.51%

BTCK vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCK has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCK vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCK nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCK and BFOC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTCK is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTCK is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

BTCK and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BTCK is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: 7RCC and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for BTCK and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCK and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer