BTCK vs. CEPI
BTCK (7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF) and CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCK is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the 7RCC Kaiko Bitcoin Carbon Credit Index, while CEPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. BTCK is passively managed, while CEPI is actively managed. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BTCK charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CEPI.
Performance
BTCK vs. CEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTCK
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CEPI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- 6M
- 10.32%
- YTD
- 15.97%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.32K | $15.25K | $78.45K | |
| $1.27M | $1.30M | $1.60M |
BTCK vs. CEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BTCK 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF | -1.29% |
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | -3.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCK and CEPI is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCK vs. CEPI — Risk / Return Rank
BTCK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CEPI
BTCK vs. CEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF (BTCK) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCK | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.63 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCK vs. CEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCK drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum CEPI drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCK and CEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCK | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -29.48% | +21.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -6.93% | +3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -8.23% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.59% | — |
Volatility
BTCK vs. CEPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCK | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.20% | 28.44% | +11.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.20% | 31.41% | +8.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.20% | 31.41% | +8.79% |
BTCK vs. CEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCK has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than CEPI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCK vs. CEPI - Dividend Comparison
BTCK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTCK 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 48.72% | 50.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCK and CEPI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTCK is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTCK is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CEPI.
CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 48.72%, compared with 0.00% for BTCK.
BTCK is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CEPI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: 7RCC and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for BTCK and 0.85% for CEPI.
Find the right allocation for BTCK and CEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer