BTCK vs. BFJL
BTCK (7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF) and BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCK is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the 7RCC Kaiko Bitcoin Carbon Credit Index, while BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Both are passively managed. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BTCK charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFJL.
Performance
BTCK vs. BFJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTCK
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BFJL
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- 6M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -4.05%
- 1Y
- -14.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.17K | $6.79K | $4.43K | |
| $13.32K | $15.25K | $78.45K |
BTCK vs. BFJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BTCK 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF | -1.29% |
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCK and BFJL is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCK vs. BFJL — Risk / Return Rank
BTCK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BFJL
BTCK vs. BFJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF (BTCK) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCK | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCK vs. BFJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCK drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum BFJL drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCK and BFJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCK | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -21.27% | +12.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -18.11% | +15.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -12.81% | +8.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.57% | — |
Volatility
BTCK vs. BFJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCK | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.20% | 13.14% | +27.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.20% | 13.17% | +27.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.20% | 13.17% | +27.03% |
BTCK vs. BFJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCK has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than BFJL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCK vs. BFJL - Dividend Comparison
BTCK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 1.40% | 1.35% |
BTCK 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCK and BFJL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTCK is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTCK is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.
BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.00% for BTCK.
BTCK is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFJL is Defined Outcome. BTCK tracks 7RCC Kaiko Bitcoin Carbon Credit Index, while BFJL tracks iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). They also come from different issuers: 7RCC and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for BTCK and 0.90% for BFJL.
Find the right allocation for BTCK and BFJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer