PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTC-USD vs. CLSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTC-USD vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitcoin (BTC-USD) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BTC-USD vs. CLSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
-23.54%-6.27%120.76%155.82%-64.23%59.40%304.57%94.10%-73.37%1,324.24%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
-13.14%9.88%-16.50%440.69%-78.57%-67.23%442.99%-73.90%-15.98%-30.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTC-USD achieves a -23.54% return, which is significantly lower than CLSK's -13.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BTC-USD has outperformed CLSK with an annualized return of 65.95%, while CLSK has yielded a comparatively lower -11.55% annualized return.


BTC-USD

1D
0.01%
1M
-7.96%
YTD
-23.54%
6M
-45.31%
1Y
-19.57%
3Y*
33.40%
5Y*
2.82%
10Y*
65.95%

CLSK

1D
1.97%
1M
-17.54%
YTD
-13.14%
6M
-44.86%
1Y
18.62%
3Y*
48.21%
5Y*
-17.49%
10Y*
-11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTC-USD vs. CLSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTC-USD
BTC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSK
CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTC-USD vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitcoin (BTC-USD) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTC-USDCLSKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.44

0.11

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.38

0.84

-1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.10

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.12

0.25

-1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.00

0.47

-2.47

BTC-USD vs. CLSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTC-USD and CLSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTC-USDCLSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

0.11

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

-0.17

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

-0.06

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

-0.06

+1.25

Correlation

The correlation between BTC-USD and CLSK is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

BTC-USD vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTC-USD drawdown since its inception was -85.30%, smaller than the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTC-USD and CLSK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BTC-USDCLSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.30%

-98.56%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.65%

-64.74%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.67%

-92.22%

+15.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.80%

-98.56%

+14.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.36%

-87.96%

+41.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.00%

-69.29%

+27.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.91%

34.43%

-6.52%

Volatility

BTC-USD vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitcoin (BTC-USD) is 12.05%, while CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a volatility of 19.86%. This indicates that BTC-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BTC-USDCLSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.05%

19.86%

-7.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.91%

70.99%

-35.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.60%

90.56%

-53.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.89%

101.36%

-54.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.71%

184.23%

-127.52%