PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTAL vs. MURGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTAL vs. MURGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Muenchener Rueckver Ges (MURGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BTAL having a -18.69% return and MURGY slightly higher at -18.36%. Over the past 10 years, BTAL has underperformed MURGY with an annualized return of -4.76%, while MURGY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.33% annualized return.


BTAL

1D
-2.26%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
-18.69%
6M
-16.94%
1Y
-35.41%
3Y*
-12.18%
5Y*
-4.53%
10Y*
-4.76%

MURGY

1D
-0.13%
1M
-12.87%
YTD
-18.36%
6M
-13.37%
1Y
-18.42%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
16.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTAL vs. MURGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
-18.69%-20.17%12.83%-15.11%20.48%-6.81%-13.86%1.07%15.13%-2.13%
MURGY
Muenchener Rueckver Ges
-18.36%36.01%23.53%34.32%14.50%2.58%4.34%38.79%4.17%28.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BTAL and MURGY is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2011

-0.26

The correlation between BTAL and MURGY shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (all time) to -0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTAL vs. MURGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTAL
BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MURGY
MURGY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MURGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MURGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MURGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MURGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MURGY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTAL vs. MURGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Muenchener Rueckver Ges (MURGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTALMURGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

0.88

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

-0.73

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.62

-1.65

+0.03

BTAL vs. MURGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTAL Sharpe Ratio is -1.61, which is lower than the MURGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTAL and MURGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTALMURGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.61

-0.82

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.72

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.28

0.63

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.50

-0.73

Drawdowns

BTAL vs. MURGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, roughly equal to the maximum MURGY drawdown of -48.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and MURGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTALMURGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.28%

-48.01%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.50%

-25.23%

-12.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.16%

-25.23%

-19.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.16%

-29.54%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.28%

-48.01%

-2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.32%

-23.90%

-25.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.98%

-8.70%

-13.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.90%

11.19%

+10.71%

Volatility

BTAL vs. MURGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) is 7.68%, while Muenchener Rueckver Ges (MURGY) has a volatility of 8.59%. This indicates that BTAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MURGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTALMURGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

8.59%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.98%

16.93%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

22.48%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

24.47%

-5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

25.96%

-8.67%

Dividends

BTAL vs. MURGY - Dividend Comparison

BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than MURGY's 5.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
3.06%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MURGY
Muenchener Rueckver Ges
5.39%3.31%3.21%2.98%3.73%2.68%2.50%2.44%3.39%10.17%9.45%4.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTAL and MURGY have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MURGY has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to BTAL (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -50.28% vs MURGY's -48.01%.

MURGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTAL and MURGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer