MURGY vs. NFLY
MURGY (Muenchener Rueckver Ges) is a stock, while NFLY (YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, MURGY returned -4.87% vs -32.36% for NFLY. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MURGY vs. NFLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MURGY achieves a -4.87% return, which is significantly higher than NFLY's -18.99% return.
MURGY
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- 6M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- -4.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.15%
NFLY
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- 6M
- -11.13%
- YTD
- -18.99%
- 1Y
- -32.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.91M | $8.55M | $12.33M | |
| $380.96K | $503.81K | $707.01K |
MURGY vs. NFLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MURGY Muenchener Rueckver Ges | -4.87% | 36.01% | 23.53% | 11.27% |
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -18.99% | 1.66% | 66.37% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MURGY and NFLY is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MURGY vs. NFLY — Risk / Return Rank
MURGY
NFLY
MURGY vs. NFLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muenchener Rueckver Ges (MURGY) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MURGY | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.79 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.80 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | -1.45 | +1.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MURGY vs. NFLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MURGY drawdown since its inception was -48.01%, which is greater than NFLY's maximum drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MURGY and NFLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MURGY | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.01% | -43.49% | -4.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -40.74% | +15.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.33% | -39.84% | +28.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -10.09% | +1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.90% | 22.37% | -9.47% |
Volatility
MURGY vs. NFLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Muenchener Rueckver Ges (MURGY) is 4.92%, while YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that MURGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MURGY | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 7.96% | -3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.88% | 22.66% | -5.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 28.74% | -6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 28.36% | -4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 28.36% | -2.71% |
Dividends
MURGY vs. NFLY - Dividend Comparison
MURGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than NFLY's 63.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MURGY Muenchener Rueckver Ges | 4.62% | 3.31% | 3.21% | 2.98% | 3.73% | 2.68% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 3.39% | 10.17% | 9.45% | 4.25% |
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 63.76% | 61.53% | 49.91% | 11.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MURGY and NFLY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLY has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to MURGY (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MURGY dropped -48.01% vs NFLY's -43.49%.
MURGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MURGY and NFLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer