PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MURGY vs. ARES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MURGY vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Muenchener Rueckver Ges (MURGY) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MURGY achieves a -19.79% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's -22.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MURGY has underperformed ARES with an annualized return of 15.57%, while ARES has yielded a comparatively higher 29.23% annualized return.


MURGY

1D
-0.98%
1M
-14.61%
YTD
-19.79%
6M
-15.02%
1Y
-18.80%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
16.19%
10Y*
15.57%

ARES

1D
-4.04%
1M
2.60%
YTD
-22.80%
6M
-22.12%
1Y
-24.14%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
20.60%
10Y*
29.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MURGY vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MURGY
Muenchener Rueckver Ges
-19.79%36.01%23.53%34.32%14.50%2.58%4.34%38.79%4.17%28.67%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
-22.80%-5.72%52.68%79.52%-12.75%77.75%37.37%110.13%-5.54%10.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MURGY and ARES is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2014

0.25

Fundamentals

EPS

MURGY:

$1.31

ARES:

$2.83

PE Ratio

MURGY:

7.70

ARES:

43.48

PEG Ratio

MURGY:

1.70

ARES:

1.73

PS Ratio

MURGY:

0.78

ARES:

4.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

MURGY:

$66.89B

ARES:

$6.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MURGY:

$66.89B

ARES:

$4.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

MURGY:

$9.67B

ARES:

$2.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MURGY vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MURGY
MURGY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MURGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MURGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MURGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MURGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MURGY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ARES
ARES Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ARES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARES Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ARES Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARES Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MURGY vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muenchener Rueckver Ges (MURGY) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MURGYARESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.92

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

-0.49

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.73

-0.99

-0.74

MURGY vs. ARES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MURGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the ARES Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MURGY and ARES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MURGYARESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

-0.60

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.56

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.80

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.62

-0.13

Drawdowns

MURGY vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MURGY drawdown since its inception was -48.01%, roughly equal to the maximum ARES drawdown of -49.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MURGY and ARES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MURGYARESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.01%

-49.73%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-49.05%

+23.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-49.73%

+24.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.54%

-49.73%

+20.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.01%

-49.73%

+1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.23%

-35.00%

+9.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.69%

-11.28%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.89%

24.48%

-13.59%

Volatility

MURGY vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison

Muenchener Rueckver Ges (MURGY) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES) have volatilities of 9.58% and 9.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MURGYARESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.58%

9.18%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.87%

34.82%

-17.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.53%

40.54%

-18.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

37.22%

-12.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.95%

36.63%

-10.68%

Dividends

MURGY vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

MURGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than ARES's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
4.51%3.29%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%5.65%4.32%6.81%
MURGY
Muenchener Rueckver Ges
5.48%3.31%3.21%2.98%3.73%2.68%2.50%2.44%3.39%10.17%9.45%4.25%

Financials

MURGY vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Muenchener Rueckver Ges and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B-5.00B0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
17.39B
1.53B
(MURGY) Total Revenue
(ARES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MURGY vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Muenchener Rueckver Ges and Ares Management Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
96.1%
Portfolio components
MURGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Muenchener Rueckver Ges reported a gross profit of 17.39B and revenue of 17.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ARES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.

MURGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Muenchener Rueckver Ges reported an operating income of 2.20B and revenue of 17.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

ARES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 364.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

MURGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Muenchener Rueckver Ges reported a net income of 1.74B and revenue of 17.39B, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.

ARES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 142.59M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MURGY and ARES have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MURGY has higher volatility (9.58%) compared to ARES (9.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MURGY dropped -48.01% vs ARES's -49.73%.

ARES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MURGY and ARES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer