BTAL vs. DWSH
Compare and contrast key facts about AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH).
BTAL and DWSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTAL is a passively managed fund by AGF that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011. DWSH is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Jul 10, 2018.
Performance
BTAL vs. DWSH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BTAL vs. DWSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | -2.99% | -20.17% | 12.83% | -15.11% | 20.48% | -6.81% | -13.86% | 1.07% | 11.71% |
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 1.79% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 17.45% | -25.74% | -49.95% | -25.27% | 22.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly lower than DWSH's 1.79% return.
BTAL
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -10.10%
- 1Y
- -31.33%
- 3Y*
- -8.29%
- 5Y*
- -1.50%
- 10Y*
- -3.16%
DWSH
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- -7.29%
- 3Y*
- -3.43%
- 5Y*
- -2.35%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BTAL vs. DWSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTAL has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is lower than DWSH's 3.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BTAL vs. DWSH — Risk / Return Rank
BTAL
DWSH
BTAL vs. DWSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTAL | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | -0.26 | -1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | -0.18 | -1.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.98 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.22 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | -0.30 | -0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTAL | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.40 | -0.26 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | -0.09 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | -0.43 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between BTAL and DWSH is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BTAL vs. DWSH - Dividend Comparison
BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than DWSH's 6.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 2.56% | 2.49% | 3.49% | 6.14% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% |
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.20% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
Drawdowns
BTAL vs. DWSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, smaller than the maximum DWSH drawdown of -82.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and DWSH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTAL | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -82.73% | +41.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.94% | -29.23% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.94% | -32.87% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.53% | -81.08% | +41.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.67% | -63.20% | +41.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.64% | 21.78% | +3.86% |
Volatility
BTAL vs. DWSH - Volatility Comparison
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) at 5.21%. This indicates that BTAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BTAL | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 5.21% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.84% | 13.92% | +1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.51% | 27.78% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 25.73% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 31.43% | -14.39% |