BTAL vs. DBMF
BTAL (AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTAL is a Long-Short fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. BTAL is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTAL returned -4.94%/yr vs 8.01%/yr for DBMF. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. BTAL charges 2.11%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.
Performance
BTAL vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -20.15% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 10.27% return.
BTAL
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- -20.15%
- 6M
- -19.27%
- 1Y
- -37.44%
- 3Y*
- -12.17%
- 5Y*
- -4.94%
- 10Y*
- -5.05%
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 26.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- —
BTAL vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | -20.15% | -20.17% | 12.83% | -15.11% | 20.48% | -6.81% | -13.86% | 4.13% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 10.27% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTAL and DBMF is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | -0.07 |
The correlation between BTAL and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTAL vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
BTAL
DBMF
BTAL vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTAL | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.47 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 4.50 | -5.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 16.30 | -17.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTAL vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTAL | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.28% | -20.39% | -29.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.50% | -6.10% | -31.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.16% | -15.60% | -29.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.16% | -20.39% | -24.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.23% | -1.91% | -48.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.01% | -6.56% | -15.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.38% | 1.68% | +20.70% |
Volatility
BTAL vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.71%. This indicates that BTAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTAL | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 2.71% | +6.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 10.00% | +6.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 12.35% | +10.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 12.55% | +6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 12.41% | +4.92% |
BTAL vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTAL has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTAL vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than DBMF's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 3.11% | 2.49% | 3.49% | 6.14% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.19% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTAL and DBMF have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTAL has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to DBMF (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -50.28% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 8.01% vs -4.94% for BTAL. On fees, DBMF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 8.01% return vs -4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBMF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 3.11% for BTAL.
BTAL is categorized as Long-Short, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: AGF and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 2.11% for BTAL and 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTAL and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer