BTAL vs. AKR
BTAL (AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) is Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AGF, while AKR (Acadia Realty Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BTAL returned -4.34%/yr vs -1.09%/yr for AKR. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
BTAL vs. AKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -16.19% return, which is significantly lower than AKR's 11.01% return. Over the past 10 years, BTAL has underperformed AKR with an annualized return of -4.34%, while AKR has yielded a comparatively higher -1.09% annualized return.
BTAL
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- YTD
- -16.19%
- 1Y
- -26.63%
- 3Y*
- -9.91%
- 5Y*
- -4.51%
- 10Y*
- -4.34%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.88%
AKR
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 25.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- -1.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $28.54M | $28.26M | $31.56M | |
| $11.44M | $8.83M | $8.21M |
BTAL vs. AKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | -16.19% | -20.17% | 12.83% | -15.11% | 20.48% | -6.81% | -13.86% | 1.07% | 15.13% | -2.13% |
AKR Acadia Realty Trust | 11.01% | -11.52% | 47.65% | 24.36% | -31.18% | 58.37% | -44.09% | 13.78% | -9.40% | -13.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTAL and AKR is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2011 | -0.26 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BTAL and AKR has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.26 to -0.02, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTAL vs. AKR — Risk / Return Rank
BTAL
AKR
BTAL vs. AKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Acadia Realty Trust (AKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTAL | AKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.21 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 2.08 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 6.81 | -8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTAL vs. AKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, smaller than the maximum AKR drawdown of -71.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and AKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTAL | AKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.70% | -71.02% | +18.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.57% | -12.41% | -22.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.83% | -31.75% | -16.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.83% | -43.82% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.70% | -70.86% | +18.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.76% | -12.98% | -34.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.25% | -24.33% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.17% | 3.79% | +15.38% |
Volatility
BTAL vs. AKR - Volatility Comparison
AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a higher volatility of 7.90% compared to Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) at 5.77%. This indicates that BTAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTAL | AKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.90% | 5.77% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.92% | 16.34% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.82% | 21.71% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 27.80% | -8.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 34.38% | -16.90% |
Dividends
BTAL vs. AKR - Dividend Comparison
BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than AKR's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKR Acadia Realty Trust | 3.58% | 3.89% | 3.06% | 4.24% | 5.02% | 2.75% | 2.04% | 4.36% | 4.59% | 3.84% | 3.55% | 2.93% |
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 2.97% | 2.49% | 3.49% | 6.14% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTAL and AKR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTAL has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to AKR (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -52.70% vs AKR's -71.02%.
AKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTAL and AKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer