PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKR vs. MITT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AKR vs. MITT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) and AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKR achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than MITT's -4.90% return. Over the past 10 years, AKR has outperformed MITT with an annualized return of -0.60%, while MITT has yielded a comparatively lower -6.63% annualized return.


AKR

1D
0.97%
1M
1.86%
YTD
7.81%
6M
13.04%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
-0.60%

MITT

1D
1.82%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-4.90%
6M
1.22%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
-6.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKR vs. MITT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
7.81%-11.52%47.65%24.36%-31.18%58.37%-44.09%13.78%-9.40%-13.13%
MITT
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
-4.90%42.79%17.10%35.77%-41.03%24.12%-80.68%8.94%-6.22%23.62%

Correlation

The correlation between AKR and MITT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2011

0.42

The correlation between AKR and MITT shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AKR:

$1.65

MITT:

$1.09

PE Ratio

AKR:

13.26

MITT:

7.20

PS Ratio

AKR:

5.00

MITT:

0.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

AKR:

$409.36M

MITT:

$492.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AKR:

$206.52M

MITT:

$464.48M

EBITDA (TTM)

AKR:

$319.25M

MITT:

$457.33M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKR vs. MITT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKR
AKR Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKR Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MITT
MITT Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
MITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKR vs. MITT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) and AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AKRMITTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

0.78

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.23

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

1.27

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.46

3.19

+1.27

AKR vs. MITT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKR Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the MITT Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKR and MITT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AKRMITTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.78

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.06

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

-0.10

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

-0.04

+0.23

Drawdowns

AKR vs. MITT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKR drawdown since its inception was -71.02%, smaller than the maximum MITT drawdown of -91.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKR and MITT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKRMITTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.02%

-91.49%

+20.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-20.74%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.75%

-25.77%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.82%

-71.11%

+27.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.02%

-91.49%

+20.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.49%

-71.74%

+56.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.38%

-38.68%

+14.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

8.23%

-4.08%

Volatility

AKR vs. MITT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) is 5.37%, while AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that AKR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MITT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKRMITTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

6.40%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

19.86%

-4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

28.44%

-6.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.07%

35.57%

-7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.28%

67.65%

-33.37%

Dividends

AKR vs. MITT - Dividend Comparison

AKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than MITT's 11.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
3.65%3.89%3.06%4.24%5.02%2.75%2.04%4.36%4.59%3.84%3.55%2.93%
MITT
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
11.35%9.98%11.28%11.34%15.25%7.90%1.02%12.32%12.40%10.52%11.10%17.72%

Financials

AKR vs. MITT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acadia Realty Trust and AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M20222023202420252026
102.99M
130.09M
(AKR) Total Revenue
(MITT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AKR and MITT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MITT has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to AKR (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKR dropped -71.02% vs MITT's -91.49%.

AKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKR and MITT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer