AKR vs. REG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG).

Performance

AKR vs. REG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AKR vs. REG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AKR Acadia Realty Trust	-5.28%	-11.52%	47.65%	24.36%	-31.18%	58.37%	-44.09%	13.78%	-9.40%	-13.13%
REG Regency Centers Corporation	11.33%	-2.78%	14.90%	11.85%	-13.59%	71.41%	-23.86%	11.43%	-12.00%	3.62%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AKR : $2.52B REG : $13.94B
EPS AKR : $0.14 REG : $3.45
PE Ratio AKR : 141.93 REG : 22.05
PS Ratio AKR : 5.84 REG : 8.25
PB Ratio AKR : 1.13 REG : 2.09
Total Revenue (TTM) AKR : $410.76M REG : $1.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) AKR : $287.24M REG : $1.02B
EBITDA (TTM) AKR : $213.17M REG : $1.07B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKR achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than REG's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, AKR has underperformed REG with an annualized return of -2.27%, while REG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.06% annualized return.

AKR

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -7.31%
• YTD: -5.28%
• 6M: -3.56%
• 1Y: -3.25%
• 3Y*: 16.03%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: -2.27%

REG

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -3.38%
• YTD: 11.33%
• 6M: 7.81%
• 1Y: 7.73%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 4.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AKR vs. REG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKR

AKR Risk / Return Rank: 31
AKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
AKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
AKR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
AKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
AKR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

REG

REG Risk / Return Rank: 52
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKR vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AKR	REG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	0.42	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.01	0.73	-0.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.09	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	0.60	-0.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	1.84	-2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AKR vs. REG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKR Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the REG Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKR and REG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AKR	REG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	0.42	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.45	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.07	0.14	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.32	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between AKR and REG is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AKR vs. REG - Dividend Comparison

AKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than REG's 3.84% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AKR Acadia Realty Trust	4.16%	3.89%	3.06%	4.24%	5.02%	2.75%	2.04%	4.36%	4.59%	3.84%	3.55%	2.93%
REG Regency Centers Corporation	3.84%	4.16%	3.67%	3.91%	4.04%	3.20%	5.22%	3.71%	3.78%	3.04%	2.90%	2.85%

Drawdowns

AKR vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKR drawdown since its inception was -71.02%, roughly equal to the maximum REG drawdown of -73.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKR and REG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AKR	REG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.02%	-73.37%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.42%	-12.39%	-5.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.82%	-30.09%	-13.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.02%	-57.02%	-14.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.75%	-3.65%	-22.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.41%	-16.25%	-8.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.16%	4.04%	+3.12%

Volatility

AKR vs. REG - Volatility Comparison

Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 3.76%. This indicates that AKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AKR	REG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.38%	3.76%	+3.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.51%	11.18%	+4.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.60%	18.52%	+8.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.28%	22.51%	+5.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.26%	29.89%	+4.37%

Financials

AKR vs. REG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acadia Realty Trust and Regency Centers Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AKR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Acadia Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 72.13M and revenue of 104.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.

REG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 279.85M and revenue of 506.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

AKR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Acadia Realty Trust reported an operating income of 20.66M and revenue of 104.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.

REG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 248.13M and revenue of 506.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

AKR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Acadia Realty Trust reported a net income of 7.71M and revenue of 104.77M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

REG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 304.71M and revenue of 506.78M, resulting in a net margin of 60.1%.