PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKR vs. REG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AKR vs. REG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKR achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly lower than REG's 18.57% return. Over the past 10 years, AKR has underperformed REG with an annualized return of -1.09%, while REG has yielded a comparatively higher 3.66% annualized return.


AKR

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.08%
6M
14.76%
YTD
11.01%
1Y
25.70%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
-1.09%
ALL TIME*
5.69%

REG

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.82%
6M
13.71%
YTD
18.57%
1Y
18.60%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
3.66%
ALL TIME*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.54M$28.26M$31.56M
$117.88M$106.66M$116.56M

AKR vs. REG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
11.01%-11.52%47.65%24.36%-31.18%58.37%-44.09%13.78%-9.40%-13.13%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
18.57%-2.78%14.90%11.85%-13.59%71.41%-23.86%11.43%-12.00%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between AKR and REG is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1993

0.57

The correlation between AKR and REG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AKR:

$3.07B

REG:

$14.66B

EPS

AKR:

$1.83

REG:

$3.60

PE Ratio

AKR:

12.21

REG:

22.32

PS Ratio

AKR:

5.30

REG:

8.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

AKR:

$404.19M

REG:

$1.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AKR:

$202.42M

REG:

$605.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

AKR:

$423.74M

REG:

$1.19B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKR vs. REG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AKR
AKR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

REG
REG Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AKR vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AKRREGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.29

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

5.64

+1.17

AKR vs. REG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKR Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the REG Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKR and REG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AKR vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKR drawdown since its inception was -71.02%, roughly equal to the maximum REG drawdown of -73.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKR and REG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKRREGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.02%

-73.37%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-8.17%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.75%

-15.10%

-16.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.82%

-30.09%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.86%

-55.76%

-15.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.98%

-2.88%

-10.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.33%

-16.11%

-8.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

3.31%

+0.48%

Volatility

AKR vs. REG - Volatility Comparison

Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 4.76%. This indicates that AKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKRREGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

4.76%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

11.61%

+4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.71%

16.06%

+5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.80%

22.18%

+5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.38%

29.90%

+4.48%

Dividends

AKR vs. REG - Dividend Comparison

AKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than REG's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
3.58%3.89%3.06%4.24%5.02%2.75%2.04%4.36%4.59%3.84%3.55%2.93%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.70%4.16%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%

Financials

AKR vs. REG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acadia Realty Trust and Regency Centers Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AKR and REG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKR has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to REG (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKR dropped -71.02% vs REG's -73.37%.

AKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKR and REG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer