BSVO vs. RWJ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) and RWJ (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. BSVO is actively managed, while RWJ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSVO returned 19.92%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for RWJ. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSVO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RWJ.

Performance

BSVO vs. RWJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSVO achieves a 22.35% return, which is significantly higher than RWJ's 19.01% return.

BSVO

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 22.35%
• 6M: 20.39%
• 1Y: 44.28%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RWJ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 4.67%
• YTD: 19.01%
• 6M: 17.54%
• 1Y: 37.61%
• 3Y*: 18.15%
• 5Y*: 8.58%
• 10Y*: 13.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSVO vs. RWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	22.35%	9.21%	4.68%	21.95%
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF	19.01%	7.75%	11.81%	12.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BSVO and RWJ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023	0.94

The correlation between BSVO and RWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSVO vs. RWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSVO	RWJ
Financial Services	33.1%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	15.1%	23.9%
Energy	14.2%	7.2%
Industrials	13.2%	16.0%
Basic Materials	6.0%	5.0%
Technology	5.7%	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	6.8%
Communication Services	4.1%	3.5%
Healthcare	3.4%	11.0%
Real Estate	0.6%	3.9%
Utilities	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

BSVO vs. RWJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSVO

BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 81
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

RWJ

RWJ Risk / Return Rank: 63
RWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSVO vs. RWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSVO	RWJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.95	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	2.83	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.34	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.35	3.34	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.22	10.72	+4.50

BSVO vs. RWJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the RWJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSVO and RWJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BSVO vs. RWJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum RWJ drawdown of -55.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and RWJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSVO	RWJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.67%	-55.97%	+27.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-11.31%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	-29.29%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-1.68%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.65%	-9.21%	+3.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	3.52%	-0.60%

Volatility

BSVO vs. RWJ - Volatility Comparison

EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) at 4.65%. This indicates that BSVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSVO	RWJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	4.65%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.19%	12.61%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.98%	19.39%	-0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.65%	23.66%	-2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.65%	26.12%	-4.47%

BSVO vs. RWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than RWJ's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSVO vs. RWJ - Dividend Comparison

BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than RWJ's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	1.24%	1.52%	1.61%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF	1.05%	1.11%	1.15%	1.34%	1.02%	0.61%	0.89%	1.22%	1.44%	1.11%	0.60%	0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSVO and RWJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, BSVO and RWJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BSVO or RWJ?

BSVO has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to RWJ (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSVO dropped -28.67% vs RWJ's -55.97%.

Which ETF is better, BSVO or RWJ?

On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 19.92% vs 18.15% for RWJ. On fees, RWJ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RWJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSVO or RWJ?

Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 19.92% return vs 18.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSVO or RWJ?

RWJ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSVO or RWJ?

BSVO has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 1.05% for RWJ.

What is the main difference between BSVO and RWJ?

They also come from different issuers: Bridgeway and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for BSVO and 0.39% for RWJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.