PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSVO vs. ISCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSVO vs. ISCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSVO achieves a 20.22% return, which is significantly higher than ISCV's 11.28% return.


BSVO

1D
1.80%
1M
0.51%
YTD
20.22%
6M
19.77%
1Y
45.25%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
10Y*

ISCV

1D
1.09%
1M
2.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.48%
1Y
29.98%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
8.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSVO vs. ISCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
20.22%9.21%4.68%22.38%
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
11.28%10.38%9.31%19.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BSVO and ISCV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023

0.95

The correlation between BSVO and ISCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSVO vs. ISCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSVO
ISCV

Financial Services

32.3%
21.1%

Energy

15.8%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

14.3%
13.4%

Industrials

13.8%
12.1%

Basic Materials

6.0%
5.8%

Technology

4.9%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.9%
1.8%

Healthcare

3.6%
11.1%

Real Estate

0.6%
11.0%

Utilities

-

3.6%

Financial Services

BSVO
32.3%
ISCV
21.1%

Energy

BSVO
15.8%
ISCV
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BSVO
14.3%
ISCV
13.4%

Industrials

BSVO
13.8%
ISCV
12.1%

Basic Materials

BSVO
6.0%
ISCV
5.8%

Technology

BSVO
4.9%
ISCV
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

BSVO
4.8%
ISCV
3.7%

Communication Services

BSVO
3.9%
ISCV
1.8%

Healthcare

BSVO
3.6%
ISCV
11.1%

Real Estate

BSVO
0.6%
ISCV
11.0%

Utilities

BSVO

-

ISCV
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSVO vs. ISCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSVO
BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCV
ISCV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ISCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSVO vs. ISCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSVOISCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

3.25

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.58

11.31

+4.27

BSVO vs. ISCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the ISCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSVO and ISCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSVOISCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.85

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.37

+0.44

Drawdowns

BSVO vs. ISCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum ISCV drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and ISCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSVOISCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.67%

-63.14%

+34.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-9.25%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.67%

-25.35%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-9.14%

+3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.66%

+0.25%

Volatility

BSVO vs. ISCV - Volatility Comparison

EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) at 3.79%. This indicates that BSVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSVOISCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

3.79%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

10.49%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.88%

16.25%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

20.83%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

23.30%

-1.57%

BSVO vs. ISCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSVO vs. ISCV - Dividend Comparison

BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than ISCV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
1.26%1.52%1.61%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
1.86%2.04%2.01%2.21%2.12%1.95%2.01%2.36%2.48%1.74%2.49%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BSVO and ISCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BSVO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to ISCV (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSVO dropped -28.67% vs ISCV's -63.14%.

On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 19.99% vs 16.49% for ISCV. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 16.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.26% for BSVO.

They also come from different issuers: Bridgeway and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for BSVO and 0.06% for ISCV.

BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSVO and ISCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer