BSVO vs. IJJ
BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) and IJJ (iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSVO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bridgeway, while IJJ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. BSVO is actively managed, while IJJ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSVO returned 19.99%/yr vs 14.45%/yr for IJJ. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSVO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IJJ.
Performance
BSVO vs. IJJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSVO achieves a 20.22% return, which is significantly higher than IJJ's 9.44% return.
BSVO
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 20.22%
- 6M
- 19.77%
- 1Y
- 45.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IJJ
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 21.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
BSVO vs. IJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 20.22% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 9.44% | 7.27% | 11.63% | 17.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSVO and IJJ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between BSVO and IJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSVO vs. IJJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSVO
IJJ
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BSVO
IJJ
Energy
BSVO
IJJ
Consumer Cyclical
BSVO
IJJ
Industrials
BSVO
IJJ
Basic Materials
BSVO
IJJ
Technology
BSVO
IJJ
Consumer Defensive
BSVO
IJJ
Communication Services
BSVO
IJJ
Healthcare
BSVO
IJJ
Real Estate
BSVO
IJJ
Utilities
BSVO
-
IJJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSVO vs. IJJ — Risk / Return Rank
BSVO
IJJ
BSVO vs. IJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSVO | IJJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | 2.08 | +3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.58 | 7.17 | +8.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSVO | IJJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.44 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.47 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
BSVO vs. IJJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum IJJ drawdown of -58.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and IJJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSVO | IJJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.67% | -58.00% | +29.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -10.59% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.67% | -22.68% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -7.93% | +2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.06% | -0.15% |
Volatility
BSVO vs. IJJ - Volatility Comparison
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) at 3.70%. This indicates that BSVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSVO | IJJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 3.70% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 10.65% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 15.28% | +3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 19.57% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 22.03% | -0.30% |
BSVO vs. IJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IJJ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSVO vs. IJJ - Dividend Comparison
BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than IJJ's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.26% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.79% | 1.81% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSVO and IJJ have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSVO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to IJJ (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSVO dropped -28.67% vs IJJ's -58.00%.
On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 19.99% vs 14.45% for IJJ. On fees, IJJ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 14.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJJ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.
IJJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.26% for BSVO.
BSVO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IJJ is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bridgeway and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for BSVO and 0.18% for IJJ.
BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSVO and IJJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer