BSV vs. WGROX
BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) and WGROX (Wasatch Core Growth Fund) are both funds - BSV is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while WGROX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch. Over the past 10 years, BSV returned 1.92%/yr vs 10.84%/yr for WGROX. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. BSV charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for WGROX.
Performance
BSV vs. WGROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSV achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than WGROX's 5.21% return. Over the past 10 years, BSV has underperformed WGROX with an annualized return of 1.92%, while WGROX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.84% annualized return.
BSV
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 3.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.65%
- 10Y*
- 1.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.52%
WGROX
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.08%
BSV vs. WGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.49% | 6.00% | 3.78% | 4.90% | -5.49% | -1.09% | 4.70% | 4.98% | 1.34% | 1.20% |
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 5.21% | -10.37% | 13.13% | 33.43% | -30.86% | 20.76% | 36.73% | 33.31% | -3.75% | 24.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSV and WGROX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007 | -0.11 |
The correlation between BSV and WGROX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSV vs. WGROX — Risk / Return Rank
BSV
WGROX
BSV vs. WGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSV | WGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.00 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | -0.14 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | -0.36 | +8.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSV vs. WGROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSV drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum WGROX drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSV and WGROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSV | WGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -61.61% | +53.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -15.58% | +14.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.53% | -27.61% | +26.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.54% | -40.16% | +31.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.54% | -40.16% | +31.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -14.65% | +14.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -9.91% | +8.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 6.14% | -5.74% |
Volatility
BSV vs. WGROX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) is 0.53%, while Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that BSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSV | WGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 5.79% | -5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.40% | 14.75% | -13.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82% | 19.67% | -17.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 23.12% | -20.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 23.31% | -20.93% |
BSV vs. WGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than WGROX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSV vs. WGROX - Dividend Comparison
BSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than WGROX's 8.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.01% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 8.13% | 8.55% | 9.22% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 16.82% | 7.21% | 10.73% | 10.14% | 6.24% | 0.15% | 12.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSV and WGROX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGROX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to BSV (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSV dropped -8.54% vs WGROX's -61.61%.
BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSV and WGROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer