PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSTP vs. XAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BSTP vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BSTP vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSTP achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly lower than XAPR's 1.03% return.


BSTP

1D
0.78%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
-2.26%
6M
-0.42%
1Y
11.88%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
10Y*

XAPR

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.03%
6M
2.74%
1Y
12.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSTP vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSTP has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BSTP vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSTP
BSTP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BSTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSTP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BSTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSTP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSTP vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSTPXAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.49

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

2.46

-1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.65

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.97

-0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.85

18.63

-11.78

BSTP vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSTP Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSTP and XAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSTPXAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.49

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.78

-1.02

Correlation

The correlation between BSTP and XAPR is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BSTP vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BSTP nor XAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BSTP vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSTP drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSTP and XAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BSTPXAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.69%

-6.18%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-6.18%

-2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-0.07%

-3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-0.18%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

0.65%

+1.13%

Volatility

BSTP vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 0.46%. This indicates that BSTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BSTPXAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

0.46%

+3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.68%

1.19%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

8.15%

+4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.28%

6.40%

+5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.28%

6.40%

+5.88%