PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSTP vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSTP vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSTP achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 13.39% return.


BSTP

1D
0.59%
1M
0.65%
6M
5.36%
YTD
6.36%
1Y
13.82%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.59%

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.97%
6M
9.59%
YTD
13.39%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.44%
ALL TIME*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$73.89K$125.57K$154.80K
$103.52M$104.25M$110.17M

BSTP vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BSTP
Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF
6.36%11.80%16.70%18.14%-5.05%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.39%15.69%16.62%10.47%-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BSTP and DGRO is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2022

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between BSTP and DGRO has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSTP vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSTP
BSTP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BSTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSTP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BSTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSTP Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSTP vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSTPDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.45

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.61

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

14.07

-4.59

BSTP vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSTP Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSTP and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSTP vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSTP drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSTP and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSTPDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.69%

-35.10%

+18.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-6.47%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-14.03%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.35%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-3.41%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

1.66%

-0.32%

Volatility

BSTP vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) is 2.32%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that BSTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSTPDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

3.21%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.74%

7.12%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.55%

9.61%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.02%

13.79%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.02%

16.58%

-4.56%

BSTP vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSTP has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSTP vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

BSTP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSTP
Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSTP and DGRO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRO has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to BSTP (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSTP dropped -16.69% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 3-year performance, DGRO leads with 16.30% vs 12.60% for BSTP. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, BSTP has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 16.30% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BSTP.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for BSTP.

BSTP is categorized as Options Trading, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. BSTP tracks S&P 500, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BSTP and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSTP and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer