PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSTP vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSTP vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BSTP having a 5.61% return and BUFF slightly lower at 5.42%.


BSTP

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.25%
YTD
5.61%
6M
5.46%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
13.67%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFF

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.38%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.44%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
12.10%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSTP vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BSTP
Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF
5.61%11.80%16.70%18.14%-5.05%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.42%11.02%12.05%16.51%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BSTP and BUFF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2022

0.94

The correlation between BSTP and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSTP vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSTP
BSTP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BSTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSTP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BSTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSTP Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSTP vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSTPBUFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.57

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.05

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

21.13

-8.78

BSTP vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSTP Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSTP and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSTP vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSTP drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSTP and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSTPBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.69%

-46.23%

+29.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-3.58%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-10.24%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.27%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-6.15%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.68%

+0.62%

Volatility

BSTP vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.66%. This indicates that BSTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSTPBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

1.66%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

4.08%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.28%

5.26%

+3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.10%

8.44%

+3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.10%

17.63%

-5.53%

BSTP vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSTP and BUFF have an expense ratio of 0.89%.


Dividends

BSTP vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither BSTP nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BSTP
Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSTP and BUFF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSTP has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to BUFF (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSTP dropped -16.69% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 3-year performance, BSTP leads with 13.67% vs 12.10% for BUFF. Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSTP has performed better with a 13.67% return vs 12.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSTP and BUFF have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.

BSTP and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BSTP is categorized as Options Trading, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. BSTP tracks S&P 500, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSTP and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer