BSTP vs. POCT
BSTP (Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both exchange-traded funds - BSTP is a Options Trading fund tracking the S&P 500, while POCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSTP returned 14.35%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for POCT. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSTP charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for POCT.
Performance
BSTP vs. POCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSTP achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 5.33% return.
BSTP
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POCT
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
BSTP vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSTP Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF | 6.07% | 11.80% | 16.70% | 18.14% | -4.95% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 5.33% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | 3.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSTP and POCT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BSTP and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSTP vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSTP
POCT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BSTP
POCT
Financial Services
BSTP
POCT
Communication Services
BSTP
POCT
Consumer Cyclical
BSTP
POCT
Healthcare
BSTP
POCT
Industrials
BSTP
POCT
Consumer Defensive
BSTP
POCT
Energy
BSTP
POCT
Utilities
BSTP
POCT
Real Estate
BSTP
POCT
Basic Materials
BSTP
POCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSTP vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank
BSTP
POCT
BSTP vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSTP | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.47 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 3.28 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.18 | 16.84 | -3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSTP | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.35 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.87 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
BSTP vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSTP drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSTP and POCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSTP | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -18.80% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -4.40% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.69% | -10.22% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.20% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -1.50% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 0.86% | +0.41% |
Volatility
BSTP vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 0.94%. This indicates that BSTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSTP | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | 0.94% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.15% | 4.77% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.93% | 6.17% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 7.94% | +4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 10.22% | +1.89% |
BSTP vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSTP has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than POCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSTP vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSTP nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSTP Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BSTP and POCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSTP has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to POCT (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSTP dropped -16.69% vs POCT's -18.80%.
On 3-year performance, BSTP leads with 14.35% vs 12.17% for POCT. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSTP has performed better with a 14.35% return vs 12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BSTP.
BSTP and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BSTP is categorized as Options Trading, while POCT is Defined Outcome. BSTP tracks S&P 500, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BSTP and 0.79% for POCT.
POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSTP and POCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer