BSTP vs. PJUL
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL).
BSTP and PJUL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSTP is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Mar 7, 2022. PJUL is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. It was launched on Aug 7, 2018. Both BSTP and PJUL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BSTP vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSTP vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSTP Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF | -3.02% | 11.80% | 16.70% | 18.14% | -4.95% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | -1.00% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | 2.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSTP achieves a -3.02% return, which is significantly lower than PJUL's -1.00% return.
BSTP
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- -3.02%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- 11.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSTP vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSTP has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSTP vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank
BSTP
PJUL
BSTP vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSTP | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.43 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 2.17 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 2.10 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 11.87 | -5.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSTP | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.43 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.83 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSTP and PJUL is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BSTP vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSTP nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSTP Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
BSTP vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSTP drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSTP and PJUL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSTP | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -18.17% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -6.99% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -2.07% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -1.50% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.24% | +0.53% |
Volatility
BSTP vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) at 2.90%. This indicates that BSTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSTP | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 2.90% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.64% | 4.16% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 10.09% | +2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.28% | 8.58% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.28% | 10.12% | +2.16% |