BSTP vs. FFTY
BSTP (Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSTP is a Options Trading fund tracking the S&P 500, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSTP returned 14.35%/yr vs 21.57%/yr for FFTY. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSTP charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
BSTP vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSTP achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.11% return.
BSTP
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
BSTP vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSTP Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF | 6.07% | 11.80% | 16.70% | 18.14% | -4.95% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 20.11% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 12.40% | -37.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSTP and FFTY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between BSTP and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSTP vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSTP
FFTY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
BSTP
FFTY
Financial Services
BSTP
FFTY
Communication Services
BSTP
FFTY
Consumer Cyclical
BSTP
FFTY
Healthcare
BSTP
FFTY
Industrials
BSTP
FFTY
Consumer Defensive
BSTP
FFTY
-
Energy
BSTP
FFTY
Utilities
BSTP
FFTY
Real Estate
BSTP
FFTY
-
Basic Materials
BSTP
FFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSTP vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
BSTP
FFTY
BSTP vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSTP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.20 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.65 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.18 | 4.36 | +8.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSTP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.12 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.20 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
BSTP vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSTP drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSTP and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSTP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -59.46% | +42.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -23.29% | +17.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.69% | -29.60% | +15.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -15.34% | +15.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -22.38% | +18.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 8.77% | -7.50% |
Volatility
BSTP vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP) is 1.52%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that BSTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSTP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | 9.42% | -7.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.15% | 26.18% | -20.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.93% | 34.09% | -26.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 29.14% | -17.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 27.41% | -15.30% |
BSTP vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSTP has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSTP vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
BSTP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSTP Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.12% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSTP and FFTY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFTY has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to BSTP (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSTP dropped -16.69% vs FFTY's -59.46%.
On 3-year performance, FFTY leads with 21.57% vs 14.35% for BSTP. On fees, FFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, BSTP has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FFTY has performed better with a 21.57% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BSTP.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for BSTP.
BSTP is categorized as Options Trading, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. BSTP tracks S&P 500, while FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BSTP and 0.80% for FFTY.
BSTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSTP and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer