PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSOL vs. EZET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSOL vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BSOL having a -40.79% return and EZET slightly higher at -39.43%.


BSOL

1D
-4.71%
1M
-14.67%
YTD
-40.79%
6M
-47.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZET

1D
-5.67%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.43%
6M
-42.74%
1Y
-31.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSOL vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BSOL
Bitwise Solana Staking ETF
-40.79%-35.81%
EZET
Franklin Ethereum ETF
-39.43%-26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BSOL and EZET is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSOL vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSOL

EZET
EZET Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSOL vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSOL vs. EZET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSOLEZETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.07

-0.41

-0.66

Drawdowns

BSOL vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSOL drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, roughly equal to the maximum EZET drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSOL and EZET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSOLEZETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.00%

-64.05%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.00%

-62.87%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.66%

-32.67%

-10.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.73%

Volatility

BSOL vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSOLEZETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.26%

68.43%

+6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.26%

72.37%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.26%

72.37%

+2.89%

BSOL vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSOL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSOL vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

Neither BSOL nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BSOL and EZET have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for BSOL.

BSOL and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price, while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BSOL and 0.19% for EZET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSOL and EZET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer