BSOL vs. EZET
BSOL (Bitwise Solana Staking ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BSOL tracks the Solana (SOL) spot price while EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSOL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.
Performance
BSOL vs. EZET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BSOL having a -40.79% return and EZET slightly higher at -39.43%.
BSOL
- 1D
- -4.71%
- 1M
- -14.67%
- YTD
- -40.79%
- 6M
- -47.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZET
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 6M
- -42.74%
- 1Y
- -31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSOL vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF | -40.79% | -35.81% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -39.43% | -26.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSOL and EZET is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSOL vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank
BSOL
EZET
BSOL vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSOL | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.07 | -0.41 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
BSOL vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSOL drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, roughly equal to the maximum EZET drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSOL and EZET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSOL | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.00% | -64.05% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -62.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.00% | -62.87% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.66% | -32.67% | -10.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.73% | — |
Volatility
BSOL vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSOL | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.26% | 68.43% | +6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.26% | 72.37% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.26% | 72.37% | +2.89% |
BSOL vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSOL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSOL vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSOL nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BSOL and EZET have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for BSOL.
BSOL and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price, while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BSOL and 0.19% for EZET.
Find the right allocation for BSOL and EZET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer