BSOL vs. CLNK
BSOL (Bitwise Solana Staking ETF) and CLNK (Bitwise Chainlink ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Bitwise - BSOL tracks the Solana (SOL) spot price while CLNK tracks the Chainlink (LINK) spot price. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSOL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CLNK.
Performance
BSOL vs. CLNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSOL
- 1D
- -4.71%
- 1M
- -14.67%
- YTD
- -40.79%
- 6M
- -47.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLNK
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- -12.86%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSOL vs. CLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF | -50.28% |
CLNK Bitwise Chainlink ETF | -41.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSOL and CLNK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSOL vs. CLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSOL | CLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.07 | -1.14 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
BSOL vs. CLNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSOL drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, which is greater than CLNK's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSOL and CLNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSOL | CLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.00% | -43.56% | -18.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.00% | -41.92% | -20.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.66% | -32.34% | -11.32% |
Volatility
BSOL vs. CLNK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSOL | CLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.26% | 67.16% | +8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.26% | 67.16% | +8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.26% | 67.16% | +8.10% |
BSOL vs. CLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSOL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CLNK's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSOL vs. CLNK - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSOL nor CLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, BSOL and CLNK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BSOL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSOL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CLNK.
BSOL and CLNK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price, while CLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK) spot price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BSOL and 0.34% for CLNK.
Find the right allocation for BSOL and CLNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer