PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSOL vs. CLNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSOL vs. CLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSOL

1D
-4.71%
1M
-14.67%
YTD
-40.79%
6M
-47.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLNK

1D
-4.18%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSOL vs. CLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
BSOL
Bitwise Solana Staking ETF
-50.28%
CLNK
Bitwise Chainlink ETF
-41.92%

Correlation

The correlation between BSOL and CLNK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSOL vs. CLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSOL vs. CLNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSOLCLNKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.07

-1.14

+0.06

Drawdowns

BSOL vs. CLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSOL drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, which is greater than CLNK's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSOL and CLNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSOLCLNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.00%

-43.56%

-18.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.00%

-41.92%

-20.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.66%

-32.34%

-11.32%

Volatility

BSOL vs. CLNK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSOLCLNKDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.26%

67.16%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.26%

67.16%

+8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.26%

67.16%

+8.10%

BSOL vs. CLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSOL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CLNK's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSOL vs. CLNK - Dividend Comparison

Neither BSOL nor CLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BSOL and CLNK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BSOL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSOL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CLNK.

BSOL and CLNK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price, while CLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK) spot price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BSOL and 0.34% for CLNK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSOL and CLNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer