PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSNSX vs. BMBSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSNSX vs. BMBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (BSNSX) and Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSNSX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than BMBSX's 1.17% return.


BSNSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.79%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*

BMBSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.24%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
1.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSNSX vs. BMBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSNSX
Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
1.68%4.83%2.92%6.53%-5.54%2.00%8.13%0.85%
BMBSX
Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
1.17%4.32%1.37%4.01%-5.99%0.01%4.23%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BSNSX and BMBSX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019

0.81

The correlation between BSNSX and BMBSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSNSX vs. BMBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSNSX
BSNSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BSNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BMBSX
BMBSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BMBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BMBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSNSX vs. BMBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (BSNSX) and Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSNSXBMBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.81

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.37

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.30

7.65

+3.65

BSNSX vs. BMBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSNSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is comparable to the BMBSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSNSX and BMBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSNSX vs. BMBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSNSX drawdown since its inception was -9.77%, roughly equal to the maximum BMBSX drawdown of -9.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSNSX and BMBSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSNSXBMBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-9.57%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.81%

-1.98%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.54%

-3.27%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.77%

-9.57%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.49%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-1.40%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.61%

-0.11%

Volatility

BSNSX vs. BMBSX - Volatility Comparison

Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (BSNSX) and Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) have volatilities of 0.46% and 0.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSNSXBMBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.45%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.26%

1.31%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59%

1.59%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.67%

2.50%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.34%

2.78%

+0.56%

BSNSX vs. BMBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSNSX and BMBSX have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

BSNSX vs. BMBSX - Dividend Comparison

BSNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than BMBSX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMBSX
Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
2.54%2.71%2.52%2.21%1.70%1.49%1.67%2.28%2.08%2.00%1.97%2.12%
BSNSX
Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
3.06%3.32%3.28%2.99%1.84%1.33%1.99%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSNSX and BMBSX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSNSX has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to BMBSX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSNSX dropped -9.77% vs BMBSX's -9.57%.

BSNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSNSX and BMBSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer