BSMZ vs. XMMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSMZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMZ is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2035 Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMZ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.

Performance

BSMZ vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMZ achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.

BSMZ

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 2.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMMO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 25.73%
• 1Y: 36.97%
• 3Y*: 32.10%
• 5Y*: 16.69%
• 10Y*: 19.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMZ vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BSMZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF	1.78%	1.82%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	23.73%	3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMZ and XMMO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025	0.29

Return for Risk

BSMZ vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMZ vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMZ	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	0.58	+0.81

Drawdowns

BSMZ vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMZ drawdown since its inception was -3.26%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMZ and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMZ	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-55.37%	+52.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	0.00%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-9.45%	+8.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSMZ	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76%	18.71%	-14.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	21.45%	-17.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.76%	22.27%	-18.51%

BSMZ vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMZ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSMZ vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

BSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSMZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF	2.02%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.60%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMZ and XMMO in my portfolio?

BSMZ and XMMO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BSMZ or XMMO?

On fees, BSMZ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMZ or XMMO?

BSMZ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMZ or XMMO?

BSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

What is the main difference between BSMZ and XMMO?

BSMZ is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XMMO is Momentum. BSMZ tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2035 Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMZ and 0.35% for XMMO.