BSMZ vs. RVNU
BSMZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF) and RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - BSMZ tracks the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2035 Index while RVNU tracks the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSMZ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for RVNU.
Performance
BSMZ vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMZ achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 3.71% return.
BSMZ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RVNU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
BSMZ vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSMZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.78% | 1.82% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.71% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMZ and RVNU is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMZ vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank
BSMZ
RVNU
BSMZ vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMZ) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMZ | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.39 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
BSMZ vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMZ drawdown since its inception was -3.26%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMZ and RVNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMZ | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -23.51% | +20.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -2.80% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.70% | -4.98% | +4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.83% | — |
Volatility
BSMZ vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMZ | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 5.12% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 7.19% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 7.27% | -3.51% |
BSMZ vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMZ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSMZ vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison
BSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than RVNU's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.02% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.52% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMZ and RVNU have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMZ.
RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.02% for BSMZ.
BSMZ tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2035 Index, while RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMZ and 0.15% for RVNU.
Find the right allocation for BSMZ and RVNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer