PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMY vs. RVNU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMY vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMY achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 3.71% return.


BSMY

1D
0.03%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.83%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RVNU

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.38%
YTD
3.71%
6M
3.08%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
1.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMY vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSMY and RVNU is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024

0.68

The correlation between BSMY and RVNU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMY vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMY
BSMY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RVNU
RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMY vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMYRVNUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.36

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.92

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

11.69

-3.16

BSMY vs. RVNU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the RVNU Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMY and RVNU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMYRVNUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.89

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.39

-0.02

Drawdowns

BSMY vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMY drawdown since its inception was -6.81%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMY and RVNU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMYRVNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-23.51%

+16.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-2.46%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-2.80%

+2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-4.98%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.83%

+0.12%

Volatility

BSMY vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) is 1.28%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that BSMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMYRVNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.42%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

3.41%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

5.12%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.23%

7.19%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

7.27%

-2.04%

BSMY vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMY vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

BSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, which matches RVNU's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMY
Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF
3.53%3.31%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.52%3.46%3.06%2.79%2.81%2.18%2.43%2.75%2.76%2.49%2.72%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMY and RVNU have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RVNU has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to BSMY (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMY dropped -6.81% vs RVNU's -23.51%.

On 1-year performance, RVNU leads with 9.62% vs 8.12% for BSMY. On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BSMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RVNU has performed better with a 9.62% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMY.

BSMY and RVNU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.53%.

BSMY tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2034 Index, while RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMY and 0.15% for RVNU.

BSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMY and RVNU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer