BSMU vs. PDBC
BSMU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. BSMU is passively managed, while PDBC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSMU returned -0.68%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for PDBC. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. BSMU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
BSMU vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMU achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 36.23% return.
BSMU
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.68%
- 10Y*
- —
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 36.23%
- 6M
- 36.27%
- 1Y
- 45.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
BSMU vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.56% | 4.35% | -0.29% | 6.31% | -13.76% | 1.88% | 4.10% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 36.23% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | 10.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMU and PDBC is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | -0.06 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BSMU and PDBC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.28, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMU vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
BSMU
PDBC
BSMU vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMU | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.43 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 6.35 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 13.39 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMU | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.46 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.65 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.23 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
BSMU vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMU drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMU and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMU | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.48% | -49.52% | +30.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.06% | -7.19% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.92% | -13.95% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.48% | -27.63% | +8.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -4.55% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -23.21% | +15.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 3.41% | -2.74% |
Volatility
BSMU vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) is 0.79%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that BSMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMU | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 6.20% | -5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.48% | 15.78% | -14.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13% | 18.61% | -16.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 19.12% | -14.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 17.78% | -12.93% |
BSMU vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMU vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
BSMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, which matches PDBC's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.80% | 2.82% | 2.92% | 2.66% | 2.16% | 1.60% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.82% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMU and PDBC have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to BSMU (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMU dropped -19.48% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 5-year performance, PDBC leads with 12.39% vs -0.68% for BSMU. On fees, BSMU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 12.39% return vs -0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 2.80% for BSMU.
BSMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PDBC is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMU and 0.58% for PDBC.
BSMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSMU and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer