BSMU vs. BSMR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSMU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF) and BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Invesco - BSMU tracks the Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index while BSMR tracks the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSMU returned -0.68%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for BSMR. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

BSMU vs. BSMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMU achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than BSMR's 1.04% return.

BSMU

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 5.50%
• 3Y*: 3.02%
• 5Y*: -0.68%
• 10Y*: —

BSMR

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 4.16%
• 3Y*: 3.03%
• 5Y*: 0.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMU vs. BSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF	0.56%	4.35%	-0.29%	6.31%	-13.76%	1.88%	4.10%
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF	1.04%	3.10%	1.51%	4.47%	-7.60%	1.09%	2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMU and BSMR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.69

The correlation between BSMU and BSMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSMU vs. BSMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSMU	BSMR
Financial Services	1.2%	1.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BSMU vs. BSMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMU

BSMU Risk / Return Rank: 72
BSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 50

BSMR

BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 94
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMU vs. BSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSMU	BSMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	3.33	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	5.57	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.74	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	7.37	-4.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.28	23.41	-15.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSMU vs. BSMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the BSMR Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMU and BSMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMU	BSMR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	3.33	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	0.16	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.22	-0.15

Drawdowns

BSMU vs. BSMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMU drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, which is greater than BSMR's maximum drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMU and BSMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMU	BSMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.48%	-13.49%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.06%	-0.57%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.92%	-3.50%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.48%	-12.02%	-7.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	0.00%	-4.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-3.49%	-4.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.18%	+0.49%

Volatility

BSMU vs. BSMR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) has a higher volatility of 0.79% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) at 0.34%. This indicates that BSMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSMU	BSMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	0.34%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.48%	0.92%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13%	1.25%	+0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.83%	3.03%	+1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.85%	5.72%	-0.87%

BSMU vs. BSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSMU and BSMR have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSMU vs. BSMR - Dividend Comparison

BSMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than BSMR's 2.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF	2.72%	2.77%	2.78%	2.72%	1.40%	1.00%	1.49%	0.45%
BSMU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF	2.80%	2.82%	2.92%	2.66%	2.16%	1.60%	0.28%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMU and BSMR in my portfolio?

BSMU and BSMR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSMU or BSMR?

BSMU has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to BSMR (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMU dropped -19.48% vs BSMR's -13.49%.

Which ETF is better, BSMU or BSMR?

On 5-year performance, BSMR leads with 0.48% vs -0.68% for BSMU. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSMU or BSMR?

Over the 5-year period, BSMR has performed better with a 0.48% return vs -0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMU or BSMR?

BSMU and BSMR have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMU or BSMR?

BSMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 2.72% for BSMR.

What is the main difference between BSMU and BSMR?

BSMU tracks Invesco Bulletshares Municipal Bond 2030 Index, while BSMR tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.