PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMS vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BSMS vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BSMS vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
0.23%3.61%1.00%4.99%-9.93%1.50%3.26%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-5.92%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMS achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -5.92% return.


BSMS

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
0.23%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
2.42%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*

QQQM

1D
3.37%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
23.76%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSMS vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BSMS vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMS
BSMS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BSMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMS vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMSQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

1.06

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.65

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.89

-0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.65

6.96

-1.31

BSMS vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMS and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMSQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.06

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.59

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.63

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between BSMS and QQQM is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BSMS vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

BSMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
2.79%2.79%2.81%2.58%1.56%1.49%1.61%0.46%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%

Drawdowns

BSMS vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMS drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMS and QQQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMSQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-35.04%

+20.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-12.55%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-35.04%

+20.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-8.99%

+7.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-8.47%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

3.41%

-2.73%

Volatility

BSMS vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) is 0.45%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that BSMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BSMSQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

6.48%

-6.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

12.73%

-11.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96%

22.42%

-19.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.61%

22.25%

-18.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.29%

22.27%

-15.98%