BSMS vs. IBMM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM).

BSMS and IBMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSMS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2028 Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2019. IBMM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. It was launched on Mar 20, 2018. Both BSMS and IBMM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BSMS vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BSMS vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF	-0.49%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Returns By Period

BSMS

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 2.42%
• 5Y*: 0.31%
• 10Y*: —

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMS vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSMS and IBMM have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

BSMS

Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF

IBMM

iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF

Return for Risk

BSMS vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMS

BSMS Risk / Return Rank: 66
BSMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
BSMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BSMS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BSMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
BSMS Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMS vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSMS	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.65	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMS	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	—	—

Dividends

BSMS vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

BSMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF	2.79%	2.79%	2.81%	2.58%	1.56%	1.49%	1.61%	0.46%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BSMS vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMS drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMS and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMS	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	0.00%	-14.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.67%	0.00%	-1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	0.00%	-5.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSMS	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96%	0.00%	+2.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.61%	0.00%	+3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.29%	0.00%	+6.29%