PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMS vs. BSMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMS vs. BSMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMS achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than BSMR's 1.04% return.


BSMS

1D
0.04%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.20%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*

BSMR

1D
0.05%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.31%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMS vs. BSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
0.82%3.61%1.00%4.99%-9.93%1.50%6.55%0.22%
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
1.04%3.10%1.51%4.47%-7.60%1.09%4.97%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMS and BSMR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.63

The correlation between BSMS and BSMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSMS vs. BSMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSMS
BSMR

Financial Services

2.6%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
0.0%

Industrials

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BSMS
2.6%
BSMR
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BSMS
0.1%
BSMR
0.0%

Industrials

BSMS
0.0%
BSMR

-

Basic Materials

BSMS

-

BSMR

-

Communication Services

BSMS

-

BSMR

-

Consumer Defensive

BSMS

-

BSMR

-

Energy

BSMS

-

BSMR

-

Healthcare

BSMS

-

BSMR

-

Real Estate

BSMS

-

BSMR

-

Technology

BSMS

-

BSMR

-

Utilities

BSMS

-

BSMR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMS vs. BSMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMS
BSMS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BSMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMR
BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMS vs. BSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMSBSMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.74

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

7.37

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

23.41

-11.60

BSMS vs. BSMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMS Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the BSMR Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMS and BSMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMSBSMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

3.33

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.16

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.22

-0.02

Drawdowns

BSMS vs. BSMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMS drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than BSMR's maximum drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMS and BSMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMSBSMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-13.49%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.05%

-0.57%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.25%

-3.50%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-12.02%

-2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

0.00%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-3.49%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.18%

+0.18%

Volatility

BSMS vs. BSMR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) has a higher volatility of 0.50% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) at 0.34%. This indicates that BSMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMSBSMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

0.34%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.91%

0.92%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50%

1.25%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.60%

3.03%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

5.72%

+0.49%

BSMS vs. BSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSMS and BSMR have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMS vs. BSMR - Dividend Comparison

BSMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than BSMR's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
2.72%2.77%2.78%2.72%1.40%1.00%1.49%0.45%
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
2.77%2.79%2.81%2.58%1.56%1.49%1.61%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMS and BSMR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSMS has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to BSMR (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMS dropped -14.95% vs BSMR's -13.49%.

On 5-year performance, BSMR leads with 0.48% vs 0.07% for BSMS. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSMR has performed better with a 0.48% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMS and BSMR have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

BSMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.72% for BSMR.

BSMS tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2028 Index, while BSMR tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index.

BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMS and BSMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer