PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMP vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMP vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSMP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPHQ

1D
0.59%
1M
6.34%
YTD
16.16%
6M
16.98%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMP vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
0.00%2.27%2.46%3.14%-5.09%0.60%4.91%0.58%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
16.16%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMP and SPHQ is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.07

The correlation between BSMP and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSMP vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSMP
SPHQ

Financial Services

50.3%
13.3%

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Industrials

0.4%
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
4.6%

Communication Services

0.0%
2.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

15.4%

Energy

-

0.7%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Technology

-

28.1%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Financial Services

BSMP
50.3%
SPHQ
13.3%

Real Estate

BSMP
2.7%
SPHQ

-

Industrials

BSMP
0.4%
SPHQ
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BSMP
0.0%
SPHQ
4.6%

Communication Services

BSMP
0.0%
SPHQ
2.0%

Basic Materials

BSMP

-

SPHQ
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

BSMP

-

SPHQ
15.4%

Energy

BSMP

-

SPHQ
0.7%

Healthcare

BSMP

-

SPHQ
8.4%

Technology

BSMP

-

SPHQ
28.1%

Utilities

BSMP

-

SPHQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMP vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMP

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMP vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSMP vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMPSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

Drawdowns

BSMP vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMPSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

Volatility

BSMP vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMPSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

BSMP vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMP vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

BSMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
1.27%2.35%2.53%2.20%1.23%0.72%1.32%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.03%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMP and SPHQ have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMP.

BSMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.

BSMP is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SPHQ is S&P 500. BSMP tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2025 Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMP and 0.15% for SPHQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMP and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer